在南美洲的大多数国家;任人唯亲、裙带关系、利益冲突、滥用权力、贪污和勒索等等都是公共生活的主要问题，从地方到国家各级都可以看到。在哥伦比亚，有适当设计但没有正确执行的规则和条例，造成哥伦比亚严重腐败的根本问题似乎是没有执行现有的规则。因此，一种文化模式，如日常生活活动中对谚语的考虑，意味着对规则的“灵活”解释。除了文化模式外，哥伦比亚是一个GDP[7]较低的发展中国家，社会不平等、阶层间巨大的收入差异、贫困和排斥主导并导致暴力。游击队和准军事组织控制着高速公路，向卡车司机收取通行费，让他们在卡车被烧毁或运走的情况下使用公路，这已经不是什么秘密了。他们还绑架记者、政客、政府官员和军人，勒索或在政府制造压力。虽然哥伦比亚人知道腐败的存在，但却不接受。然而，人们却用讽刺或反讽来指代这一受道德、价值观和伦理等文化特征影响的问题。腐败的案件在哥伦比亚是无数的,很难判断一个是坏的,其他第一因为一些相关或连接,第二是因为他们都有影响了国家经济,社会也在哥伦比亚被认为在国际层面上,影响与其他国家的关系,信任水平对当权者是谁应该照顾公民的权利。
澳洲悉尼政治学作业代写:哥伦比亚的腐败
In most of the countries in South America; cronyism, nepotism, conflict of interests, abuse of power, embezzlement and extortion to name a few are part of the main problems of public life and can be observed at all levels, from the local up to the National level. In Colombia there are rules and regulations properly designed but not correctly applied, the fundamental problem causing high levels of corruption in Colombia appears to be the failure to apply the existing rules. Therefore, a cultural pattern such as the consideration of sayings in daily life activities implies a rather “flexible” interpretation of rules. “Hecha la ley, hecha la trampa” (every law made, there is also made the loophoIn addition to cultural patterns, Colombia is a developing country with a low GDP [7] where social inequality, great income differences between strata, poverty and exclusion predominate and lead to violence. It is not a secret that Guerrilla and Paramilitary groups control highways charging truck drivers a toll to use the road having the truck burnt or taken away. They also kidnap journalists, politicians, government officials and military men for extortion or to cause pressure in the government. Although Colombians are aware that corruption exists, it’s not accepted. However, people instead use sarcasm or irony to refer to this issue influenced by cultural features such as morality, values and ethics.The cases of corruption in Colombia are innumerable and it is hard to tell if one is worst that the other first because some are related or connected and second because all of them have affected the country economically, socially and also in the way Colombia is perceived at the international level, affecting relations with other countries and levels of trust towards those in power who are supposed to look after the citizens’ rights.